Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Calvin Hemery vs Damien Wenger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hemery vs Wenger analysis and find out who is favored!
Calvin Hemery vs Damien Wenger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hemery has won 50.77% of points on his second serve, while Wenger has won 51.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hemery, in recent form, has won 46.77% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wenger has won 55.57%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.31% and 38.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hemery has saved 60.21% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wenger has saved 52.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hemery has won 60% of matches played (W/L 45/ 30), with Wenger winning 63.01% (W/L 46/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hemery has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 184/ 120), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Wenger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 242/ 123), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Hemery has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 34/ 24), where as Wenger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.31% of matches (W/L 32/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hemery winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hemery winning 2 and Wenger winning 0. The last match between Hemery and Wenger was at the Kigali 1 Challenger, 28-02-2024, Second, Clay with Calvin Hemery getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hemery and Wenger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hemery winning 0 times and Wenger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hemery winning 0, and Wenger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hemery has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.77 while Wenger has played against players with an average rank of 263.53.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hemery has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wenger has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hemery has converted 36.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wenger has converted 47.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hemery 1 - 0 Wenger
205
Rank
116
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
381
Rank
363
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
58% (362-258)
Career Total W/L
64% (253-140)
43% (12-16)
YTD W/L
62% (16-10)
$181,475
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Calvin Hemery | Damien Wenger |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:29 | 1:46:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (46/68) | 55% (37/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (36/46) | 65% (24/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (14/22) | 57% (17/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/5) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (26/67) | 26% (18/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Calvin Hemery
Player
Damien Wenger
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Calvin Hemery | Damien Wenger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (12/16) | 62% (16/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (29/35) | 60% (34/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (306/322) | 54% (290/243) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 52% (11/10) | 62% (16/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.56 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 170 | 21 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 74 | 81 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:31 | 1:53:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 274.61 | 323.69 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1223/1969) | 61% (1032/1690) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (855/1223) | 64% (657/1032) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (380/746) | 51% (338/658) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (62/167) | 49% (101/206) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (738/1997) | 45% (786/1740) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 48% (11/12) | 61% (11/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (11/26) | 60% (15/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (14/11) | 93% (14/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (14/3) | 7% (14/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 7% (14/1) | 25% (12/3) |
Calvin Hemery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Calvin Hemery
61%
(
76 of
124)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
110)
4
Aces
11
11
Double Faults
10
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
52 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
117
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Calvin Hemery
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Henry Searle
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Alexander Ritschard
57%
(
76 of
133)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
46%
(
26 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
41%
(
54 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Damien Wenger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Damien Wenger
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
79%
(
55 of
70)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Rocco Piatti
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Damien Wenger
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Niccolo Ciavarella
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
80%
(
48 of
60)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Alexander Klintcharov
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
78%
(
31 of
40)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Damien Wenger
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Damien Wenger
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Anton Matusevich
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
62)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Damien Wenger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hemery Vs Wenger Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
